Hello Fritz,
As I've told you, my blog www.calunia.com.br
has suffered repeated censorship orders from the Taquara Courthouse,
starting with an order to remove "any reference to the complainant" from a single page,
which I promptly did. There then came an order to remove "remove any
and all reference to the complainant in any of his publications." I went
through the blog to change all references to his name to "He Who Must
Not be Named".
Fraud
Let
me make this absolutely clear: the public bank BRDE was defrauded when
the deed for Parcel 2025 was presented to it as a loan guarantee, when
in fact the Hotel Ocara was built on a different parcel, with a value a
mere fraction of the loan principal. Dana Wayne Harbour, your neighbor
at Colina and fellow American naturist, was also defrauded
when he was told that Parcel 2025 underlay the hotel; and when in
exchange for his R$250,000 he got 20% of the investment, while He Who
Must Not Be Named and his family got 80% in exchange for their
investment of R$5,000.
Wayne
was murdered in his house in Colina do Sol. The police chief told me he
couldn't investigate the crime as murder because the coroner said Wayne
died of a heart attack; the coroner said, "The case must still be open,
it was homicide." That, too, is documented in the blog. The
then-president of Colina do Sol is living in Wayne's house; and of
course He Who Must Not Be Named is living in the hotel built with
Wayne's money, with the taxpayers' money, and the money of other
defrauded "investors".
No slander
Brazilian
libel law is peculiar. One can describe a transaction, or a series of
transactions as fraud, but one can't describe as a "cheat" someone whose
every traceable transaction over thirty years was a fraud. Knowing the
law, I never broke it.
And in the case of accusation
of a crime - presenting false documents to the court, defrauding a
public bank - truth is a defense. BRDE Bank was defrauded by the
presentation of worthless guarantees for the Ocara Hotel loan. That's
proven in the blog.
Fraudulent Bankruptcy
The
Taquara Courthouse indicted me for slandering the good name of He Who
Must Not Be Named, but in another case at the same courthouse, he's
indicted for fraudulent bankruptcy: Naturis Inc. gave its assets to Colina do Sol, leaving a labor judgement in the death of an employee, unpaid.
Colina filed for Naturis's bankruptcy on discovering it had become the owner of Naturis. Quite a number of Colina residents who were present at the meeting where it was decided to ask for bankruptcy, were also indicted - you among them. I wouldn't be surprised though if the Taquara Courthouse feels that it's perfectly OK to say that you were indicted in that case, but not all right at all to say that He Who Must Not Be Named or other members of the Colina mob were indicted.
Colina filed for Naturis's bankruptcy on discovering it had become the owner of Naturis. Quite a number of Colina residents who were present at the meeting where it was decided to ask for bankruptcy, were also indicted - you among them. I wouldn't be surprised though if the Taquara Courthouse feels that it's perfectly OK to say that you were indicted in that case, but not all right at all to say that He Who Must Not Be Named or other members of the Colina mob were indicted.
Truth is the only defense
As
you've learned, Fritz, being accused of a crime that never happened is
difficult. You can be proven innocent of a real crime, when the actual
criminal is caught. Since it happened, there are traces, and there's a
criminal out there somewhere. Unless the real criminal is caught, many
people will always think, "They must be guilty or they wouldn't have
been accused".
But in the case of an invented crime, how do you show you're innocent? The police invent such evidence and elicit such testimony as backs up their accusations. Mostly they do it badly, we were able to prove many contradictions, documented in the blog. The one-sided "court secrecy" practiced by the Taquara Courthouse was also a hindrance, allowing the police to freely spread lies, but cracking down on anyone who spoke the truth.
But in the case of an invented crime, how do you show you're innocent? The police invent such evidence and elicit such testimony as backs up their accusations. Mostly they do it badly, we were able to prove many contradictions, documented in the blog. The one-sided "court secrecy" practiced by the Taquara Courthouse was also a hindrance, allowing the police to freely spread lies, but cracking down on anyone who spoke the truth.
The blog shows the
truth. In Portuguese, of course, but still the truth. It's long, it's
complex, it's cross-connected, but it answers the questions. The answer
to "Why were they accused if nothing happened?" has an answer, and it's
"To cover up the land frauds, that they were getting to close to." I
believe it was also to cover up the murder of Wayne Harbour, but proving
that would require a police investigation, and an investigation of the
police.
You are allowed to defend your reputation.
The blog is your best defense. It's not possible to eliminate from the
blog "any and all reference than can suggest the person of the
complainant", because the fraud is the elephant in the room, the motive
for the false accusations that led to the false imprisonments, to the
deaths that left so many orphans.
I cannot prune the
blog, nor can I leave it off the air indefinitely, while the Colina
Courthouse, having censored the truth, simply never sets a hearing.
So
I'm sending you a copy of the blog. Not a simple task, it took a week
of programming to insure that all the links worked - for without the
interconnections, the proof underlaying every accusation of a crime on
the part of the police, the accusers, the false psychiatrists or the
Colina mob, an investigation and documentation that took months of work
becomes disconnected chunks of unsupported text.
My blog, www.calunia.com.br, remains off the air. www.calunia.com,
without the .br, is your responsibility, just as it is your defense.
You are beyond the range of the Brazilian courts. In fact there's an
American law, inspired in part by an absurd Brazilian court case against
by friend Joe Sharkey, that gives you damages in three times the amount
of your legal costs, should anyone down here attempt to attack you.
Best of luck to you and your family.
Cheers,
Richard
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário